Systems Neuroecology

If only those behaviours evolve that increase the actor’s own survival and reproductive success, then it might come as a surprise that cooperative behaviours, i.e. providing benefits to others, are a widespread phenomenon. Many animals cooperate even with unrelated individuals in various contexts, like providing care or food. One possibility to explain these behaviours is reciprocity. Reciprocal cooperation, i.e. helping those that were helpful before, is a ubiquitous and important trait of human sociality. Still, the evolutionary origin of it is largely unclear, mainly because it is believed that other animals do not exchange help reciprocally. Consequently, reciprocity is suggested to have evolved in the human lineage only. In contrast to this, I propose that reciprocity is not necessarily cognitively demanding and likely to be widespread. In my talk, I will first shed light on the mechanisms of reciprocal cooperation in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). In a series of studies, my colleagues and I have demonstrated that Norway rats reciprocally exchange goods and services between and within different commodities and independent of kinship. Furthermore, to understand the evolutionary origins of human reciprocity, and whether it is shared with other animals, I will then discuss evidence for reciprocity in non-human primates, which are our closest living relatives. A thorough analysis of the findings showed that reciprocity is present and, for example, not confined to unrelated individuals, but that the choice of commodities can impact the likelihood of reciprocation. Based on my findings, I conclude that reciprocal cooperation in non-human animals is present but largely neglected and not restricted to humans. In order to deepen our understanding of the evolutionary origins of reciprocity in more general, future studies should investigate when and how reciprocity in non-human animals emerged and how it is maintained.

Praying mantises are the only insects known to have stereo vision. We used a comparative approach to determine how the mechanisms underlying stereopsis in mantises differ from those underlying primate stereo vision. By testing mantises with virtual 3D targets we showed that mantis stereopsis enables prey capture in complex scenes but the mechanisms underlying it differ from those underlying primate stereopsis. My talk will further discuss how stereopsis combines with second-order motion perception to enable the detection of camouflaged prey by mantises. The talk will highlight the benefits of a comparative approach towards understanding visual cognition.

Collective behavior of organisms creates environmental micro-niches that buffer them from environmental fluctuations e.g., temperature, humidity, mechanical perturbations, etc., thus coupling organismal physiology, environmental physics, and population ecology. This talk will focus on a combination of biological experiments, theory, and computation to understand how a collective of bees can integrate physical and behavioral cues to attain a non-equilibrium steady state that allows them to resist and respond to environmental fluctuations of forces and flows. We analyze how bee clusters change their shape and connectivity and gain stability by spread-eagling themselves in response to mechanical perturbations. Similarly, we study how bees in a colony respond to environmental thermal perturbations by deploying a fanning strategy at the entrance that they use to create a forced ventilation stream that allows the bees to collectively maintain a constant hive temperature. When combined with quantitative analysis and computations in both systems, we integrate the sensing of the environmental cues (acceleration, temperature, flow) and convert them to behavioral outputs that allow the swarms to achieve a dynamic homeostasis.

To communicate effectively, two individuals must take turns to prevent overlap in their signals. How does the nervous system coordinate vocalizations between two individuals? Female and male plain-tailed wrens sing a duet in which they alternate syllable production so rapidly and precisely it sounds as if a single bird is singing. I will talk about experiments that examine the interaction between sensory cues and motor activity, using behavioral manipulations and neurophysiological recordings from pairs of awake, duetting wrens. I will show evidence that auditory cues link the brains of the wrens by modulating motor circuits.

Aggression is an innate social behavior essential for competing for resources, securing mates, defending territory and protecting the safety of oneself and family. In the last decade, significant progress has been made towards an understanding of the neural circuit underlying aggression using a set of modern neuroscience tools. Here, I will talk about the history and recent progress in the study of aggression.

Bats are extreme aviators and amazing navigators. Many bat species nightly com-mute dozens of kilometres in search of food, and some bat species annually migrate over thousands of kilometres. Studying bats in their natural environment has al-ways been extremely challenging because of their small size (mostly <50 gr) and agile nature. We have recently developed novel miniature technology allowing us to GPS-tag small bats, thus opening a new window to document their behaviour in the wild. We have used this technology to track fruit-bats pups over 5 months from birth to adulthood. Following the bats’ full movement history allowed us to show that they use novel short-cuts which are typical for cognitive-map based naviga-tion. In a second study, we examined how nectar-feeding bats make foraging deci-sions under competition. We show that by relying on a simple reinforcement learn-ing strategy, the bats can divide the resource between them without aggression or communication. Together, these results demonstrate the power of the large scale natural approach for studying animal behavior.

During the course of an animal’s interaction with its environments, activity within central neural circuits is orchestrated exquisitely to structure goal-oriented movement. During walking, for example, the head, body and limbs are coordinated in distinctive ways that are guided by the task at play, and also by posture and balance requirements. Hence, the overall performance of goal-oriented walking depends on the interplay between task-specific motor plans and stability reflexes. Copies of motor plans, typically described by the term efference copy, modulate stability reflexes in a predictive manner. However, the highly uncertain nature of natural environments indicates that the effect of efferent copy on movement control is insufficient; additional mechanisms must exist to regulate stability reflexes and coordinate motor programs flexibly under non-predictable conditions. In this talk, I will discuss our recent work examining how self-generated visual signals orchestrate the interplay between task-specific motor plans and stability reflexes during a self-paced, goal-oriented walking behavior.

The evolution of speech is considered to be one of the hardest problems in science. Studies of the communicative abilities of our closest living relatives, the nonhuman primates, aim to contribute to a better understanding of the emergence of this uniquely human capability. Following a brief introduction over the key building blocks that make up the human speech faculty, I will focus on the question of meaning in nonhuman primate vocalizations. While nonhuman primate calls may be highly context specific, thus giving rise to the notion of ‘referentiality’, comparisons across closely related species suggest that this specificity is evolved rather than learned. Yet, as in humans, the structure of calls varies with arousal and affective state, and there is some evidence for effects of sensory-motor integration in vocal production. Thus, the vocal production of nonhuman primates bears little resemblance to the symbolic and combinatorial features of human speech, while basic production mechanisms are shared. Listeners, in contrast, are able learning the meaning of new sounds. A recent study using artificial predator shows that this learning may be extremely rapid. Furthermore, listeners are able to integrate information from multiple sources to make adaptive decisions, which renders the vocal communication system as a whole relatively flexible and powerful. In conclusion, constraints at the side of vocal production, including limits in social cognition and motivation to share experiences, rather than constraints at the side of the recipient explain the differences in communicative abilities between humans and other animals.

Hydra is a fascinating model organism for neuroscience. It is transparent; new genetic lines allow one to image activity in both neurons (Dupre and Yuste, 2017) and muscle cells (Szymanski and Yuste, 2019) ; it exhibits rich behavior, and it continually rebuilds itself. Hydra’s fairly simply physical structure as a two-layered fluid-filled hydrostat and the accessibility of information about neural and muscle activity opens the possibility of a complete model of neural control of behavior. This requires understanding the transformations that occur in the muscle cell layers and a biomechanical model of the body column. We show that we can use this modeling to reverse engineer how neural activity drives behavior.

How does the presence or absence of food shape and prioritize behavioral decisions? When is food more than just food? As in other animals, prolonged food deprivation dramatically alters sensory behaviors in C. elegans. For instance, it has been known since the mid-1970s that hungry worms no longer respond to temperature changes in their environment, but the underlying mechanisms have been unclear. I will describe unpublished work showing that insulin signaling from the gut regulates thermosensory behaviors as a function of feeding state by engaging a modulatory sensorimotor circuit that gates the output of the core thermosensory network. C. elegans is associated with, and consumes, diverse bacteria in the wild. I will also discuss a recent story in which we find that in addition to providing nutrition, a bacterial strain in the worm gut alters the hosts’ olfactory behavior and drives food choice decisions by producing a neurotransmitter that targets the hosts’ sensory neurons. These results add to our growing body of knowledge of how signaling from the gut modulates peripheral and central neuron properties and drives sensory behavioral plasticity.

A globally invasive form of the mosquito Aedes aegypti has evolved to specialize in biting humans, making it an efficient vector of dengue, yellow fever, Zika, and chikungunya. Host-seeking females identify humans primarily by smell, strongly preferring human odour over the odor of non-human animals. Exactly how they discriminate, however, is unclear. Human and animal odors are complex blends that share most of the same chemical components, presenting an interesting challenge in sensory coding. I will talk about recent work from the lab showing that (1) human and animal blends can be distinguished by the relative concentration of a diverse array of compounds and that (2) these complex chemical differences translate into a neural code for human odor that involves as few as two to three olfactory glomeruli in the mosquito brain. Our work demonstrates how organisms may evolve to discriminate complex odor stimuli of special biological relevance with a surprisingly simple combinatorial code and reveals novel targets for the design of next-generation mosquito control strategies.

Many innate behaviours are the result of multiple sensorimotor programs that are dynamically coordinated to produce higher-order behaviours such as courtship or architecture construction. Extendend phenotypes such as architecture are especially useful for ethological study because the structure itself is a physical record of behavioural intent. A particularly elegant and easily quantifiable structure is the spider orb-web. The geometric symmetry and regularity of these webs have long generated interest in their behavioural origin. However, quantitative analyses of this behaviour have been sparse due to the difficulty of recording web-making in real-time. To address this, we have developed a novel assay enabling real-time, high-resolution tracking of limb movements and web structure produced by the hackled orb-weaver Uloborus diversus. With its small brain size of approximately 100,000 neurons, the spider U. diversus offers a tractable model organism for the study of complex behaviours. Using deep learning frameworks for limb tracking, and unsupervised behavioural clustering methods, we have developed an atlas of stereotyped movement motifs and are investigating the behavioural state transitions of which the geometry of the web is an emergent property. In addition to tracking limb movements, we have developed algorithms to track the web’s dynamic graph structure. We aim to model the relationship between the spider’s sensory experience on the web and its motor decisions, thereby identifying the sensory and internal states contributing to this sensorimotor transformation. Parallel efforts in our group are establishing 2-photon in vivo calcium imaging protocols in this spider, eventually facilitating a search for neural correlates underlying the internal and sensory state variables identified by our behavioural models. In addition, we have assembled a genome, and are developing genetic perturbation methods to investigate the genetic underpinnings of orb-weaving behaviour. Together, we aim to understand how complex innate behaviours are coordinated by underlying neuronal and genetic mechanisms.

Animals exhibit extraordinary variation in their behaviour, yet little is known about the neural mechanisms that generate this diversity. My lab has been taking advantage of the rapid diversification of male courtship behaviours in Drosophila to gain insight into how evolution shapes the nervous system to generate species-specific behaviours. By translating neurogenetic tools from D. melanogaster to closely related Drosophila species, we have begun to directly compare the homologous neural circuits and pinpoint sites of adaptive change. Across species, P1 interneurons serve as a conserved and key node in regulating male courtship: these neurons are selectively activated by the sensory cues carried by an appropriate mate and their activation triggers enduring courtship displays. We have been examining how different sensory pathways converge onto P1 neurons to regulate a male’s state of arousal, honing his pursuit of a prospective partner. Moreover, by performing cross-species comparison of these circuits, we have begun to gain insight into how reweighting of sensory inputs to P1 neurons underlies species-specific mate recognition. Our results suggest how variation at flexible nodes within the nervous system can serve as a substrate for behavioural evolution, shedding light on the types of changes that are possible and preferable within brain circuits.

behaviour varies even among genetically identical animals raised in the same environment. However, little is known about the circuit or anatomical underpinnings of this individuality, though previous work implicates sensory periphery. Drosophila olfaction presents an ideal model to study the biological basis of behavioural individuality, because while the neural circuit underlying olfactory behaviour is well-described and highly stereotyped, persistent idiosyncrasy in behaviour, neural coding, and neural wiring have also been described. Projection neurons (PNs), which relay odor signals sensed by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to deeper brain structures, exhibit variable calcium responses to identical odor stimuli across individuals, but how these idiosyncrasies relate to individual behavioural responses remains unknown. Here, using paired behaviour and two-photon imaging measurements, we show that idiosyncratic calcium dynamics in both ORNs and PNs predict individual preferences for an aversive monomolecular odorant versus air, suggesting that variation at the periphery of the olfactory system determines individual preference for an odor’s presence. In contrast, PN, but not ORN, calcium responses predict individual preferences in a two-odor choice assay. Furthermore, paired behaviour and immunohistochemistry measurements reveal that variation in ORN presynaptic density also predicts two-odor preference, suggesting this site is a locus of individuality where microscale circuit variation gives rise to idiosyncrasy in behaviour. Our results demonstrate how a neural circuit may vary functionally and structurally to produce variable behaviour among individuals.

The dominant view of perception right now is that information travels from the environment to the sensory system, then to the nervous systems which processes it to generate a percept and behaviour. Ongoing behaviour is thought to occur largely through simple iterations of this process. However, this linear view, where information flows only in one direction and the properties of the environment and the sensory system remain static and unaffected by behaviour, is slowly fading. Many of us are beginning to appreciate that perception is largely active, i.e. that information flows back and forth between the three systems modulating their respective properties. In other words, in the real world, the environment and sensorimotor loop is pretty much always closed. I study the loop; in particular I study how the reverse arm of the loop affects sound and vibration perception. I will present two examples of motor modulation of perception at two very different temporal and spatial scales. First, in crickets, I will present data on how high-speed molecular motor activity enhances hearing via the well-studied phenomenon of active amplification. Second, in spiders I will present data on how body posture, a slow macroscopic feature, which can barely be called ‘active’, can nonetheless modulate vibration perception. I hope these results will motivate a conversation about whether ‘active’ perception is an optional feature observed in some sensory systems, or something that is ultimately necessitated by both evolution and physics.

Collective behaviour operates without central control, through interactions among individuals. The collective behaviour of ant colonies is based on simple olfactory interactions. Ant species differ enormously in the algorithms that regulate collective behaviour, reflecting diversity in ecology. I will contrast two species in very different ecological situations. Harvester ant colonies in the desert, where water is scarce but conditions are stable, regulate foraging to conserve water. Response to positive feedback from olfactory interactions depends on the risk of water loss, mediated by dopamine neurophysiology. For arboreal turtle ants in the tropical forest, life is easy but unpredictable, and a highly modular system uses negative feedback to sustain activity. In all natural systems, from ant colonies to brains, collective behaviour evolves in relation with changing conditions. Similar dynamics in environmental conditions may lead to the evolution of similar processes to regulate collective behaviour.

How nervous systems control behaviour is the main question we seek to answer in neuroscience. Although visual systems have been a popular entry point into the brain, we don’t understand—in any deep sense—how visual perception guides navigation in flies (or any organism). I will present recent progress towards this goal from our lab. We are using anatomical insights from connectomics, genetic methods for labelling and manipulating identified cell types, neurophysiology, behaviour, and computational modeling to explain how the fly brain processes visual motion to regulate behaviour.

Animals rely on an internal sense of body position and movement to effectively control motor behaviour. This sense of proprioception is mediated by diverse populations of internal mechanosensory neurons distributed throughout the body. My lab is trying to understand how proprioceptive stimuli are detected by sensory neurons, integrated and transformed in central circuits, and used to guide motor output. We approach these questions using genetic tools, in vivo two-photon imaging, and patch-clamp electrophysiology in Drosophila. We recently found that the axons of fly leg proprioceptors are organized into distinct functional projections that contain topographic representations of specific kinematic features: one group of axons encodes tibia position, another encodes movement direction, and a third encodes bidirectional movement and vibration frequency. Whole-cell recordings from downstream neurons reveal that position, movement, and directional information remain segregated in central circuits. These feedback signals then converge upon motor neurons that control leg muscles during walking. Overall, our findings reveal how a low-dimensional stimulus – the angle of a single leg joint – is encoded by a diverse population of mechanosensory neurons. Specific proprioceptive parameters are initially processed by parallel pathways, but are ultimately integrated to influence motor output. This architecture may help to maximize information transmission, processing speed, and robustness, which are critical for feedback control of the limbs during adaptive locomotion.